Europe's Path to Decarbonization in Waste Management
- Methane & Landfilling Trajectories in CZ, HR, and SI
Dipl.-Ing.(TU) Werner P. Bauer

Methane emissions from landfills may not always make the headlines, but they are a critical piece of the climate puzzle. As countries work towards their climate targets, reducing methane from waste is one of the fastest ways to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
A recent study by Prognos and ifeu takes a closer look at how landfilling and methane emissions could evolve across Europe under different policy pathways. Its findings underline the importance of reducing biodegradable waste sent to landfill, improving methane capture, and strengthening circular economy measures to unlock significant climate benefits.
Reading the study made me curious about what these findings mean on the ground. While the report presents a European perspective, the realities and priorities can differ from country to country. That's why I reached out to our Country Lead for the Czech Republic to hear their views on the most important actions needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from landfills—not only in the Czech Republic, but also in neighbouring Croatia and Slovenia.
Read on to discover the priorities for reducing landfill methane emissions and what they could mean for the region's climate transition.
Methane & Landfilling Trajectories in CZ, HR, and SI
Building on the quantitative assessment developed alongside ifeu, which models future methane emissions from municipal solid waste (MSW) deposited in landfills across Europe from 2022 to 2050 (tracked through 2130), looking at Central and South-Eastern Europe reveals distinct regional pathways.
While the overarching study covers aggregated data for the EU-27+UK, the Czech Republic was selected as one of the dedicated target markets for a country-specific deep-dive assessment. You can find out more about the Czech Republic’s successful steps toward sustainable waste management on the country page for the Czech Republic.
Comparing the Czech Republic's detailed findings with the broader regional context of Croatia and Slovenia illustrates how local regulations, infrastructure readiness, and household sorting habits shape long-term emission curves.
1. Country Profiles and Legislative Drivers
- Czech Republic (The Deep-Dive Transition Market): As highlighted in the core report's country assessment, the Czech Republic faces a pivotal decade. The implementation of the Waste Act (No. 541/2020 Coll.), which targets restrictions on landfilling recyclable and organic MSW by 2030, places bio-waste diversion as the single largest factor in flattening its long-term methane emission curve through 2130. A crucial prerequisite for this shift is the systemic expansion of anaerobic digestion capacity and the construction of modern biogas plants dedicated to the controlled processing of organic waste fractions.
- Slovenia (The Regional Benchmark with Downstream Bottlenecks): Modeled within the EU-wide baseline scenario, Slovenia demonstrates the impact of early bio-waste diversion from landfills, resulting in an earlier methane peak. However, it faces structural downstream challenges: the waste-to-energy loop for non-biological residual waste remains unclosed due to a lack of domestic capacity for the energy recovery of Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF / SRF).
- Croatia (The Scaling Market): Represented in the broader regional context, Croatia is consolidating its waste sector by expanding regional waste management centers (CGOs) and scaling up bio-waste separation to meet EU 2035 targets (<10% landfilling). However, similar to Slovenia, it still lacks a fully planned, closed-loop system for the energy recovery of residual non-organic waste and RDF fractions.
2. Key Takeaways from the Modeling Approach
- Decades-Long Landfill Gas Legacy: Because the organic component of MSW decays anaerobically over extended periods within landfills, the composition of waste landfilled today dictates landfill gas generation up to 2130.
- Synergy Between Anaerobic Digestion and Energy Recovery: Diverting organic waste into anaerobic digestion reactors within biogas plants directly eliminates uncontrolled methane emissions at the source. However, comprehensive decarbonization of the waste management sector requires simultaneously addressing downstream capacity for RDF energy recovery—without which the material-energy cycle remains incomplete.
- Closing the Infrastructure Gap: To achieve projected reduction scenarios by 2050, CEE countries must align household sorting habits with dedicated downstream infrastructure—both for anaerobic digestion in biogas plants and for the energy recovery of residual RDF.
by Jakub Dolezal, Vojtech Dolezal and Mirnela Džaferagić
Comments:
Dear Mr. Bauer,
Thank you for sharing this insightful analysis. The study highlights an important lesson: effective methane reduction requires more than restricting landfilling—it requires an integrated waste management system that connects source separation, organic waste treatment, material recovery, and energy recovery.
The long-term impact of today's landfill decisions is particularly significant. The fact that waste deposited today can continue generating methane for decades demonstrates the importance of acting early, especially on biodegradable waste diversion.
From a Kenyan and broader African perspective, these lessons are highly relevant. Many countries are still developing the infrastructure required for source segregation, Material Recovery Facilities, anaerobic digestion, composting, and appropriate treatment of residual waste. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity to avoid locking future generations into long-term landfill methane emissions.
One key question for Africa is: How can the European experience and modelling approaches be adapted to support developing countries in establishing affordable, integrated waste management systems before landfill dependence becomes further entrenched?
I believe platforms such as Waste Culture can play an important role in connecting European experience with African realities, particularly through knowledge exchange, technology transfer, capacity building, and partnerships that can mobilize investment for sustainable waste infrastructure.
Thank you for continuing to highlight the critical link between waste management, methane reduction, and climate action. I look forward to further discussions on how these lessons can contribute to sustainable waste management in Kenya and across Africa.
Jimmy Owiti
Thank you for sharing this insightful analysis. The study highlights an important lesson: effective methane reduction requires more than restricting landfilling—it requires an integrated waste management system that connects source separation, organic waste treatment, material recovery, and energy recovery.
The long-term impact of today's landfill decisions is particularly significant. The fact that waste deposited today can continue generating methane for decades demonstrates the importance of acting early, especially on biodegradable waste diversion.
From a Kenyan and broader African perspective, these lessons are highly relevant. Many countries are still developing the infrastructure required for source segregation, Material Recovery Facilities, anaerobic digestion, composting, and appropriate treatment of residual waste. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity to avoid locking future generations into long-term landfill methane emissions.
One key question for Africa is: How can the European experience and modelling approaches be adapted to support developing countries in establishing affordable, integrated waste management systems before landfill dependence becomes further entrenched?
I believe platforms such as Waste Culture can play an important role in connecting European experience with African realities, particularly through knowledge exchange, technology transfer, capacity building, and partnerships that can mobilize investment for sustainable waste infrastructure.
Thank you for continuing to highlight the critical link between waste management, methane reduction, and climate action. I look forward to further discussions on how these lessons can contribute to sustainable waste management in Kenya and across Africa.
Jimmy Owiti
09.08.2026 18:00:40
Please log in to leave a comment!
More blog-entries:
03.09.2026 - Limiting Overshoot - Waste Management's Pathway to 1.5°C
27.07.2026 - The European Emissions Trading System is Undergoing a Review:
26.06.2026 - Europe's Raw Materials Paradox
12.05.2026 - IFAT 2026 - Discussing the Findings of the White Book
02.05.2026 - IFAT – World's Leading Trade Fair for Water, Sewage, Waste and Raw Materials Management
21.04.2026 - “What a Waste 3.0” Highlights the Drivers of Resource Waste and Emissions
20.03.2026 - Waste Prevention Versus Economic Growth
03.03.2026 - The Difference of the One and the Many
12.02.2026 - Waste Prevention: The Collision of Ambition, Reality and Growth Pressure
19.01.2026 - Every day, waste ends up in landfills and dumps —
27.07.2026 - The European Emissions Trading System is Undergoing a Review:
26.06.2026 - Europe's Raw Materials Paradox
12.05.2026 - IFAT 2026 - Discussing the Findings of the White Book
02.05.2026 - IFAT – World's Leading Trade Fair for Water, Sewage, Waste and Raw Materials Management
21.04.2026 - “What a Waste 3.0” Highlights the Drivers of Resource Waste and Emissions
20.03.2026 - Waste Prevention Versus Economic Growth
03.03.2026 - The Difference of the One and the Many
12.02.2026 - Waste Prevention: The Collision of Ambition, Reality and Growth Pressure
19.01.2026 - Every day, waste ends up in landfills and dumps —