Understanding the Evolution of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Emissions in China: Patterns, Determinants, and Control Measures
This study evaluates the evolution of MSW incineration emissions between 2005 and 2020 across 510 waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities nationwide, using a multi-pollutant framework involving nine major emissions.
by Abdoulaye Boré , Jicui Cui, Guanyi Chen, Nickolas J. Themelis, Wenchao Ma
Abstract
Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration has become central to China’s waste management strategy, driven by rapid urbanization, environmental constraints, and energy recovery goals. This study evaluates the evolution of MSW incineration emissions between 2005 and 2020 across 510 waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities nationwide, using a multi-pollutant framework involving nine major emissions. These pollutants include NOx, SO2, PM, HCl, CO, dioxins, Hg, Cd + Tl, and Sb + As + Pb + Cr + Co + Cu + Mn + Ni. The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) was used to explore the impact of socioeconomic factors, treatment structures, and emission intensities. The results reveal a multi-phase, policy-driven emission trajectory shaped by technological transformation, regulatory milestones, and regional inequalities. Three policy phases were identified, corresponding to national Five-Year Plans (FYPs). During the 13th FYP (2016–2020), emission intensity (EI) reductions accounted for over 80 % of net SO2 and PM emission declines, and more than 60 % for dioxins and HCl, driven by advanced flue gas treatment and moving grate (MG) incinerator adoption. Despite national improvements, regional disparities persist. Larger incinerators (≥1000 t/d) showed 40–60 % lower emissions than smaller ones (≤300 t/d), while NOx concentrations remained high across all plant sizes. This research highlights the critical role of policy and technology in driving emission reductions, while also exposing governance and infrastructure gaps that undermine progress.
Abdoulaye Boré et al., Atmospheric Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2025.102741
published: Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9|2024
Keywords: Energy Recovery, Pollution Control, Policy Tax Instruments, Sustainability, Climate, Resource management, Mixed Waste, Methods, Analyses, Data, China
Related papers
What can we expect in waste management with regard to emissions trading systems from 2026 onwards?
COP30 Is Over. But for the World’s Most Vulnerable, the Crisis is Ongoing
UN Climate Change Conference - COP 30 - Belém, Brazil, HIGH-LEVEL MINISTERIAL EVENT: Waste management and Circular Economy
Techno-Economic and Environmental Impact Assessment of Organic Waste Incineration for Energy Recovery in Jordan
Ten New Insights in Climate Science 2025
Waste-to-energy: How Europe can avoid sleepwalking into a landfill catastrophe and achieve net zero
Enhanced phosphorus reclamation from secondary effluent through Donnan dialysis and vivianite crystallization
Assessing the circularity potential of textile flows for future markets in Denmark: A study of textile anatomy
How to Scale Up Effective International Climate Finance by the EU?
The Global Plastics Treaty must include strict global controls on plastic waste trade
COP30 Is Over. But for the World’s Most Vulnerable, the Crisis is Ongoing
UN Climate Change Conference - COP 30 - Belém, Brazil, HIGH-LEVEL MINISTERIAL EVENT: Waste management and Circular Economy
Techno-Economic and Environmental Impact Assessment of Organic Waste Incineration for Energy Recovery in Jordan
Ten New Insights in Climate Science 2025
Waste-to-energy: How Europe can avoid sleepwalking into a landfill catastrophe and achieve net zero
Enhanced phosphorus reclamation from secondary effluent through Donnan dialysis and vivianite crystallization
Assessing the circularity potential of textile flows for future markets in Denmark: A study of textile anatomy
How to Scale Up Effective International Climate Finance by the EU?
The Global Plastics Treaty must include strict global controls on plastic waste trade
