Understanding the Evolution of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Emissions in China: Patterns, Determinants, and Control Measures
This study evaluates the evolution of MSW incineration emissions between 2005 and 2020 across 510 waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities nationwide, using a multi-pollutant framework involving nine major emissions.
by Abdoulaye Boré , Jicui Cui, Guanyi Chen, Nickolas J. Themelis, Wenchao Ma
Abstract
Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration has become central to China’s waste management strategy, driven by rapid urbanization, environmental constraints, and energy recovery goals. This study evaluates the evolution of MSW incineration emissions between 2005 and 2020 across 510 waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities nationwide, using a multi-pollutant framework involving nine major emissions. These pollutants include NOx, SO2, PM, HCl, CO, dioxins, Hg, Cd + Tl, and Sb + As + Pb + Cr + Co + Cu + Mn + Ni. The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) was used to explore the impact of socioeconomic factors, treatment structures, and emission intensities. The results reveal a multi-phase, policy-driven emission trajectory shaped by technological transformation, regulatory milestones, and regional inequalities. Three policy phases were identified, corresponding to national Five-Year Plans (FYPs). During the 13th FYP (2016–2020), emission intensity (EI) reductions accounted for over 80 % of net SO2 and PM emission declines, and more than 60 % for dioxins and HCl, driven by advanced flue gas treatment and moving grate (MG) incinerator adoption. Despite national improvements, regional disparities persist. Larger incinerators (≥1000 t/d) showed 40–60 % lower emissions than smaller ones (≤300 t/d), while NOx concentrations remained high across all plant sizes. This research highlights the critical role of policy and technology in driving emission reductions, while also exposing governance and infrastructure gaps that undermine progress.
Abdoulaye Boré et al., Atmospheric Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2025.102741
published: Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9|2024
Keywords: Energy Recovery, Pollution Control, Policy Tax Instruments, Sustainability, Climate, Resource management, Mixed Waste, Methods, Analyses, Data, China
Related papers
Integration of Landfills into the EU-ETS 1
Plastics recycling and hazardous substances – Risk Cycle 2026
Climate Protection Policy Instruments - Incentive Models for Carbon Dioxide Removal
PFAS: REACH Restriction Process - State of Play
Assessment of the Destruction and Removal Efficiency of PFAS in an Incinerator for Hazardous Waste
Removal and Complete Technical Destruction of PFAS on Activated Carbon
13 Years of Experience from a Waste to Energy Plant of the EU-ETS
Integrating Carbon Capture into Waste-to-Energy Plants Without Efficiency Losses - Lessons Learnt from the Nordics and Implications for German Facilities
How are Methane Emissions from Landfills Taken into Account in Emissions Trading
Waste Incineration - Source or Sink for PFAS?
Plastics recycling and hazardous substances – Risk Cycle 2026
Climate Protection Policy Instruments - Incentive Models for Carbon Dioxide Removal
PFAS: REACH Restriction Process - State of Play
Assessment of the Destruction and Removal Efficiency of PFAS in an Incinerator for Hazardous Waste
Removal and Complete Technical Destruction of PFAS on Activated Carbon
13 Years of Experience from a Waste to Energy Plant of the EU-ETS
Integrating Carbon Capture into Waste-to-Energy Plants Without Efficiency Losses - Lessons Learnt from the Nordics and Implications for German Facilities
How are Methane Emissions from Landfills Taken into Account in Emissions Trading
Waste Incineration - Source or Sink for PFAS?
